2026-09-02

Tiger Woods plea deal for DUI/reckless driving charge

9 outlets covered the same story. Here's how their headlines landed on the −5 (Far Left) to +5 (Far Right) spectrum — a 0.0-point gap between the most-left and most-right framing.

Far LeftCenterFar Right

How the coverage framed it

Coverage of Tiger Woods's plea deal was remarkably uniform across outlets, with a bias spread of just 0.0 points and no meaningful ideological divide to report. Nearly every headline relied on plain legal language — "pleads no contest," "pleads guilty," "plea deal" — and stuck closely to the core facts: the reduced or reckless-driving charge, the five-year license loss, and the avoidance of jail time. Reuters and Sky News emphasized the driving ban ("loses driver's license for five years," "five-year driving ban"), while AP and USA Today foregrounded the plea type. The one notable outlier was NBC, whose headline referenced Tony Romo rather than Woods and quoted an admission of "over-reliance on alcohol," suggesting either an editorial mix-up or a related sidebar story. That anomaly aside, the shared framing across outlets was straightforwardly factual, with no loaded language, partisan emphasis, or ideological signal detected.

Scores are AI estimates of headline language, not factual ratings. Each headline is scored 0 (neutral) outward to Far Left / Far Right by Claude and Grok.