Tiger Woods reaches plea deal in DUI or car crash case
3 outlets covered the same story. Here's how their headlines landed on the −5 (Far Left) to +5 (Far Right) spectrum — a 0.0-point gap between the most-left and most-right framing.
How the coverage framed it
Coverage of this story was largely uniform across all three outlets, with a bias spread of just 0.0 points separating the most-left from the most-right headline. Each outlet adopted straightforward, wire-style legal reporting language. The Washington Post anchored its headline in the phrase "reaches plea deal in DUI arrest," emphasizing the negotiated legal outcome and the original charge. USA Today specified the legal mechanism — "pleads no contest to reduced charges" — and grounded the story in the physical event of "Florida car crash." Neutral News focused on the concrete consequence, noting Woods "Loses License for Five Years" after pleading to reckless driving. These minor differences reflect editorial choices about which factual detail to foreground — the original charge, the plea type, or the penalty — rather than any ideological framing. No outlet applied loaded language, selective moral emphasis, or politically suggestive phrasing.
- +0.0Washington Post · CenterGolfer Tiger Woods reaches plea deal in DUI arrest
- ▸ neutral verb 'reaches plea deal' — factual
- ▸ no ideological signal
- +0.0USA Today · CenterTiger Woods pleads no contest to reduced charges in Florida car crash
- ▸ neutral factual legal reporting
- ▸ no loaded framing
- +0.0Neutral News · CenterTiger Woods Pleads to Reckless Driving, Loses License for Five Years
- ▸ neutral factual wire-style headline
- ▸ factual consequence detail — no ideological signal
Scores are AI estimates of headline language, not factual ratings. Each headline is scored 0 (neutral) outward to Far Left / Far Right by Claude and Grok.