2026-09-08

New Hampshire primary elections and Democratic Senate race

6 outlets covered the same story. Here's how their headlines landed on the −5 (Far Left) to +5 (Far Right) spectrum — a 0.5-point gap between the most-left and most-right framing.

Far LeftCenterFar Right

How the coverage framed it

Coverage of New Hampshire's primary elections was largely uniform across outlets, with a bias spread of just 0.5 points separating the most left-leaning from the most right-leaning headline. Nearly all outlets adopted neutral, informational framing — the New York Times used a straightforward "What to Watch" guide format, Politico posed a neutral question about political outcomes, and the Boston Globe focused on factual details such as federal election monitors and a congressional race preview. The modest exception was the Guardian, whose phrase "crucial to Democrats' Senate hopes" introduced a slight Democratic-centered lens by foregrounding one party's electoral stakes rather than treating the race as a broadly shared civic event. No outlet employed charged or ideologically loaded language, and the shared tone across the coverage emphasized factual reporting, electoral context, and candidate narratives without meaningfully favoring a political direction.

Scores are AI estimates of headline language, not factual ratings. Each headline is scored 0 (neutral) outward to Far Left / Far Right by Claude and Grok.