2026-11-02

Democrat Haley Stevens endorses Republican Mike Rogers

21 outlets covered the same story. Here's how their headlines landed on the −5 (Far Left) to +5 (Far Right) spectrum — a 4.5-point gap between the most-left and most-right framing.

Far LeftCenterFar Right

How the coverage framed it

Coverage of Haley Stevens's endorsement of Mike Rogers spans a notable 4.5-point bias spread. At the left end, the Guardian framed Stevens as someone who "faces backlash," casting her critics sympathetically, while HuffPost dramatized her decision with the emotive phrase "Something Snapped In Her," implying psychological instability rather than political calculation. A second Guardian piece linked the endorsement to Israel, adding ideological skepticism toward Stevens's motives. The large middle of the spectrum — including NPR, NBC, the Washington Post, and multiple Hill headlines — used neutral verbs like "endorses" and "backs," treating the story as a straightforward political event. Moving rightward, the Federalist suggested concealment with "Won't Let Voters See," framing El-Sayed as hiding something. Furthest right, National Review described El-Sayed as "The Gerry Adams of the Muslim Brotherhood," an extreme comparative framing that links him to terrorist-associated organizations — language absent from any centrist or left-leaning headline.

Scores are AI estimates of headline language, not factual ratings. Each headline is scored 0 (neutral) outward to Far Left / Far Right by Claude and Grok.