2026-11-03

Michigan Democrat Haley Stevens endorses Republican Rogers

9 outlets covered the same story. Here's how their headlines landed on the −5 (Far Left) to +5 (Far Right) spectrum — a 4.5-point gap between the most-left and most-right framing.

Far LeftCenterFar Right

How the coverage framed it

Coverage of Haley Stevens' endorsement of Republican Mike Rogers spanned a 4.5-point bias range, with framing shifting markedly from sympathetic concern on the left to contemptuous mockery on the right. The Free Press, at the left end of the spectrum, cast Stevens as a victim with the phrase "The Purging of Haley Stevens," using martyr-adjacent language to frame Democratic blowback as an act of political purification. Moving rightward, outlets like National Review offered quieter conservative sympathy — "Haley Stevens Is Not Alone" — validating her crossover without sensationalism. Fox News introduced negative framing of her act itself, calling the endorsement a "stunt" that "backfires," while Breitbart used "Rages" to emotionally amplify liberal media criticism of her. At the far right, the New York Post abandoned political analysis entirely, labeling Stevens a "Dem pariah" with a "ridiculous new look" and quoting "totally off her rocker" — substituting tabloid contempt for substantive coverage.

Scores are AI estimates of headline language, not factual ratings. Each headline is scored 0 (neutral) outward to Far Left / Far Right by Claude and Grok.